Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to search

TITLE IV: Financial Compensation & Reparations

SEC. 401. Innovation Reparations Fund

(a) ESTABLISHMENT: There is established in the Treasury the "Innovation Reparations Fund" with an initial appropriation of $50 billion.

(b) PURPOSE: Compensate originators for:

  1. Historical biopiracy
  2. Erasure of BIPOC, women, queer, working-class inventors
  3. Ongoing use of innovations

(c) DISTRIBUTION:

Historical Biopiracy Redress ($10 Billion):

Case Compensation Recipients
Neem (India) $500M Indian Council of Agricultural Research + farmer cooperatives
Turmeric (India) $200M Traditional medicine practitioners association
Basmati (India/Pakistan) $1B Farmer cooperatives in Punjab, Haryana (India); Punjab, Sindh (Pakistan)
Quinoa (Andes) $750M Indigenous communities (Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador)
Ayahuasca (Amazon) $500M Indigenous nations (distributed by COICA - Coordinator of Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon Basin)
Hoodia (San people) $250M San Council of Southern Africa
Rosy periwinkle (Madagascar) $2B Madagascar government + traditional healers
Kava (Pacific Islands) $500M Pacific Island communities (distributed by Pacific Islands Forum)
Other documented cases $4.3B As identified by Innovation Justice Council

Erasure Redress ($20 Billion):

Category Compensation Recipients
Black inventors (historical) $10B Descendants + Black innovation funds + HBCUs
Women inventors (historical) $5B Women's innovation funds + women's universities
LGBTQ+ inventors (historical) $2B LGBTQ+ community organizations + archives
Indigenous inventors (domestic) $3B Tribal nations (distributed according to tribal governance)

Ongoing Use Compensation ($20 Billion over 10 years = $2B/year):

Per Title II, Sec. 202: Creators of innovations used in federal programs receive:

  • One-time payments: $1-5M (individuals)
  • Ongoing royalties: 0.5-1% of program budgets
  • Research support: $10-50M (institutions)

Examples (from earlier chat):

  • Dr. Eva Ramón Gallegos (PDT): $5M + equipment
  • Bunker Roy / Barefoot College (Solar Mamas): $5M + 1% ongoing
  • Kongjian Yu / Turenscape (Sponge Cities): $25M
  • Land Life (Cocoons): $150M
  • Mylea (Mycelium): $2M + 0.5% royalties
  • Code Effort (Cigarette Recycling): $1M
  • Sharkina Shah (Toxic-Free Fabric): $3M
  • Etc.

(d) APPLICATION PROCESS:

Originators or Their Representatives May Apply For:

  1. Compensation for historical theft
  2. Ongoing royalties for current use
  3. Research/capacity-building grants

Innovation Justice Council Reviews Applications, determines fair compensation based on:

  • Extent of use
  • Value generated
  • Harm caused by theft
  • Replicability (can innovation be used elsewhere?)

(e) NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: Claims may be filed for historical theft regardless of when it occurred (slavery-era theft, colonial-era appropriation, etc.)

SEC. 402. Benefit-Sharing Enforcement

(a) MANDATORY AGREEMENTS:

Before Any Commercial Use of Innovation from:

  • The Global South
  • Indigenous communities
  • Traditional knowledge
  • Marginalized inventors

Entity Must Execute Benefit-Sharing Agreement approved by Innovation Justice Council

(b) MINIMUM STANDARDS:

Agreements Must Include:

  1. Revenue Sharing: 5-20% of gross revenues (depending on contribution of traditional knowledge vs. additional R&D)
  2. Advance Payment: Upfront payment upon commercialization (not "eventual profits")
  3. Transparency: Annual financial reporting to originators
  4. Technology Transfer: Originators receive technical knowledge, manufacturing capacity
  5. Termination Clause: Originators can terminate if terms violated
  6. Cultural Protections: Respect for sacred uses and community values

(c) GOVERNMENT AS GUARANTOR:

If the Company Fails to Pay, Innovation Justice Fund covers owed amounts, then government pursues company for repayment + penalties

SEC. 403. Tax on Biopiracy Profits

(a) WINDFALL PROFITS TAX:

Entities That Have Profited from Biopiracy or Erasure Shall Pay:

90% Tax on ALL Profits attributable to stolen innovations (retroactive 20 years)

Examples:

  • Pharmaceutical companies with patents on traditional medicines
  • Seed companies with patents on indigenous crop varieties
  • Tech companies that failed to credit BIPOC/women/queer inventors

(b) CALCULATION:

Innovation Justice Council determines:

  1. Total revenues from contested innovation
  2. R&D costs (if any) by company
  3. Contribution of traditional knowledge/original inventor
  4. Fair allocation of profits

Tax applied to the portion attributable to stolen knowledge

Example:

  • Drug based on traditional Amazonian medicine
  • Company claims $100M R&D costs, $10B revenues
  • Council determines traditional knowledge = 80% of innovation
  • Taxable Profit: $10B revenues - $100M costs = $9.9B × 80% = $7.92B
  • Tax (90%): $7.13B paid to Innovation Reparations Fund → distributed to Indigenous communities

(c) COLLECTION:

IRS shall collect this tax with same enforcement powers as other taxes (liens, asset seizure, criminal prosecution for evasion)