Other Breakthough Technologies
1. Tidal & Wave Energy:
Potential:
- Predictable - Tides follow the moon (100% predictable)
- High Energy Density - Coastal areas with strong tides/waves
- 24/7 - Unlike solar, it works day/night
Current Status:
- Small-Scale Demonstrations - UK, France, and Canada are leading
- Expensive - $200-400/MWh (vs. $30-50 for solar/wind)
- Technical Challenges - Harsh marine environment, biofouling, and maintenance
Investment:
- $10 billion - Support demonstrations, R&D
- Target: 5 GW capacity by 2040
- Focus: Tidal (more mature than a wave)
Jobs: 10,000
2. Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS):
Concept:
- Geothermal Can Be Anywhere - Drill deep (10,000+ feet), inject water, and extract heat
- Not Just Hotspots - Works anywhere with hot rocks deep down (i.e., everywhere!)
- Baseload - 24/7 power
Current Status:
- Demonstration Projects - Fervo Energy (Nevada), Eavor (Alberta)
- Costs Are High - Drilling is expensive
- Potentially Huge - 100+ GW potential in the U.S.
Investment:
- $20 billion - Drilling technology, pilot projects
- Target: 20 GW capacity by 2040
Jobs: 30,000
3. Space-Based Solar Power:
Concept:
- Solar Panels in Orbit - Capture sunlight 24/7 (no night, clouds)
- Beam Energy to Earth - Microwave or laser
- Limitless Power - The Sun always shines in space
Current Status:
- Theoretical - Demonstrated in lab, not at scale
- Is Extremely Expensive - Launch costs and construction in space
- Decades Away - 2050s-2060s at the earliest
Investment:
- $5 billion - Long-term R&D, demonstrations
- Not Near-Term - But could be transformative if achieved
4. Thorium Reactors (Fission):
Concept:
- Nuclear Fission - But using thorium instead of uranium
- Advantages:
- More abundant than uranium
- Less long-lived waste
- Can't weaponize (proliferation-resistant)
- Meltdown-proof (molten salt reactors)
Current Status:
- Demonstrations - China and India are pursuing
- The U.S. Abandoned - 1970s (uranium lobby won)
Investment:
- $10 billion - Research, pilot reactors
- Hedge - In case fusion doesn't work, thorium might
5. Direct Air Capture (DAC):
Not Energy Production, But Related:
- Capture CO2 from the Air - Remove past emissions
- Energy-Intensive - Needs lots of clean energy
- Critical for Net-Zero - Offset hard-to-eliminate emissions
Investment:
- $50 billion - Scale up DAC
- Powered by Fusion/Renewables - Otherwise pointless
- (Covered Separately in the Climate Restoration Programs)